| Comments(12) |
| Guest 12-22-2014, 12:17 AM |
 0  0 |
#12 |
|
|
| Guest 12-22-2014, 12:16 AM |
0 0 |
#11 |
|
|
| Guest 12-22-2014, 12:16 AM |
0 0 |
#10 |
|
|
| ckloh 05-25-2014, 8:36 AM |
0 0 |
#9 |
| thank you |
|
| MovFor 08-15-2013, 4:33 PM |
0 0 |
#8 |
| @EspenMA; indeed, despite outdated it still makes you thrill. |
|
| CrusaderXV 12-04-2012, 2:09 AM |
0 0 |
#7 |
| The original with Arnold is much better in so many ways than the recent remake which left me somewhat disapointted. |
|
| firegee100 11-17-2012, 5:43 PM |
1 0 |
#6 |
| Who will buy me some megs to watch non free films ? |
|
| souvli 10-18-2012, 5:57 AM |
0 0 |
#5 |
| I've seen the remake. The original, even though it's 22 years old, is still better. Schwartz-his-name should have done the remake as well. |
|
| johnwarren3 04-13-2012, 12:34 PM |
1 0 |
#4 |
| Amazing how well this holds up after 20 years, but I'd to see the remake as well. |
|
| alvasil 12-21-2011, 2:59 PM |
1 0 |
#3 |
|
|
|
You MUST log infor posting.